Advertisement

 

 

Accuracy of p57(KIP2) compared with genotyping for the diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Accuracy of p57(KIP2) compared with genotyping for the diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Information (click to view)

Madi JM, Braga AR, Paganella MP, Litvin IE, Da Ros Wendland EM,


Madi JM, Braga AR, Paganella MP, Litvin IE, Da Ros Wendland EM, (click to view)

Madi JM, Braga AR, Paganella MP, Litvin IE, Da Ros Wendland EM,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Systematic reviews 2016 Oct 45(1) 169

Abstract
BACKGROUND
Distinguishing hydatidiform moles (HMs) from non-molar specimens and the subclassification of HM are important because complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) is associated with an increased risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. However, diagnosis based solely on morphology has poor interobserver reproducibility. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of p57(KIP2) immunostaining improves diagnostic accuracy for CHM.

METHODS
We will conduct a systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies to evaluate the accuracy of p57(KIP2) immunostaining compared with molecular genotyping for the diagnosis of CHM. A high-sensitivity search strategy will be employed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, The Grey Literature Report, OpenGrey, OAIster, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Two reviewers will independently screen all identified references for eligibility and extract data. The methodological quality and bias of the included studies will be assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool, and the overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. If a meta-analysis is possible, pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios will be calculated using bivariate random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated with I (2) statistics and explored through sensitivity analysis.

DISCUSSION
There is considerable overlap between the histological features of molar and non-molar pregnancies and between complete and partial HMs, which results in significant interobserver variability in the diagnosis of CHM and its mimics. Therefore, molecular techniques are used to correctly diagnosis and treat CHM. However, these molecular diagnostic methods are technically difficult to perform, relatively costly, and unavailable in most pathology laboratories. According to our results, p57(KIP2) immunostaining appears to be a practical and accurate adjunct for the diagnosis of CHM and its mimics because this technique is relatively simple, reliable, cost-efficient, and rapid. This systematic review will help to determine whether p57(KIP2) immunostaining is an adequate alternative diagnostic test for CHM.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42015024181.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 + 12 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]