Advertisement

 

 

Aspirin Use for Primary CVD Prevention

Aspirin Use for Primary CVD Prevention
Author Information (click to view)

Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD

Investigator, Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety
Staff Cardiologist
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
Associate Director for Research, Cardiology Fellowship Training Program
Associate Professor, Section of Cardiovascular Research
Baylor College of Medicine

Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that he has received grant/research support (all significant and paid to the institution [not individual]) from the Department of Veterans Affairs, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association.

Figure 1 (click to view)
Figure 2 (click to view)
+


Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD (click to view)

Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD

Investigator, Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety
Staff Cardiologist
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
Associate Director for Research, Cardiology Fellowship Training Program
Associate Professor, Section of Cardiovascular Research
Baylor College of Medicine

Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that he has received grant/research support (all significant and paid to the institution [not individual]) from the Department of Veterans Affairs, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association.

+
+
Advertisement
A study has found that many patients inappropriately receive aspirin for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and there appears to be significant variation across practices. The findings highlight the need to improve evidence-based use of aspirin for primary CVD prevention.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

With cardiovascular disease (CVD) continuing to be the leading cause of death in the United States, greater emphasis has been placed on primary and secondary prevention strategies. “Clinical guidelines recommend aspirin as secondary prevention in patients with preexisting CVD and as primary prevention in those without CVD who have a moderate to high 10-year risk of developing it,” says Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD. However, there is no proof that aspirin use reduces adverse cardiovascular events in patients without CVD and a low 10-year CVD risk. In addition, concerns have been raised about using aspirin because it can increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes in some patients.

The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on primary prevention of CVD and stroke recommend that aspirin be used in patients with 10-year coronary and stroke risks of 10% or higher. However, other groups have cautioned clinicians to weigh the benefit of preventing CVD against risks for increased GI bleeding and stroke. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends using aspirin if a patient’s 5-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk is 3% or higher (or a 10-year CHD risk of 6% or higher). In 2011, the AHA/American Stroke Association guidelines for primary prevention of stroke recommended aspirin use for primary prevention if 10-year CVD risks were at least 6% to 10%.

As a result of these recommendations, aspirin use for primary prevention is considered appropriate in patients with 10-year CVD risks of 6% or higher. “However, given the risk of GI bleeding and stroke, using aspirin for primary prevention in patients at low risk of cardiovascular events would be potentially inappropriate,” says Dr. Virani.

Examining Variations in Use

For a study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Dr. Virani and colleagues examined the frequency and practice-level variation in inappropriate aspirin use for primary CVD prevention. The study team used data from patients enrolled in the American College of Cardiology’s National Cardiovascular Disease Registry’s Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) registry. The PINNACLE registry allowed the investigators to assess 68,808 unique patients who received aspirin for primary prevention from 119 U.S. practices. The frequency of inappropriate aspirin use was determined by the drug being used in patients with 10-year CVD risks lower than 6%.

Overall, the annual trend of inappropriate aspirin use in the PINNACLE registry decreased from 14.5% in 2008 to 9.1% in 2013 (Figure 1). “However, we found that overall, 11.6% of patients were receiving aspirin for primary CVD prevention with a 10-year CVD risk less than 6%, thus receiving aspirin inappropriately,” says Dr. Virani. There were also significant practice-level variations in the inappropriate use of aspirin, ranging between 0% and 71.8% for practices (Figure 2). Results remained consistent after excluding women older than 65 and patients with diabetes. The study noted that nearly 80% of patients receiving inappropriate aspirin therapy were women, and the frequency of inappropriate aspirin use was 16.6% for females compared with 5.3% for males.

Significant Implications

It is possible that cardiologists may be preconditioned to seeing patients with a high burden of CVD and thus have a low threshold to use aspirin for primary CVD prevention, which at times may be inappropriate. “Some patients considered to be at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events due to having multiple cardiovascular risk factors can benefit from using aspirin in preventing cardiovascular events, and these benefits may outweigh bleeding risk,” Dr. Virani says. “However, other patients who are at low risk for cardiovascular events could be harmed by aspirin use due to an increased risk of major bleeding.”

Results of the study provide an important benchmark for the inappropriate use of aspirin for primary CVD prevention in outpatient U.S. practices. According to Dr. Virani, there appears to be important opportunities to improve evidence-based use of aspirin for primary CVD prevention. “Patients should be warned about self-medicating with aspirin since it’s an over-the-counter medication,” he says. “They should be instructed to discuss all medications they take with their physician during follow-up. Patient and public education is critical to avoiding inappropriate aspirin use.”

Dr. Virani adds that clinicians should be more vigilant about using risk calculators for CVD. “Using objective cardiovascular risk calculators can help ensure that aspirin is being used appropriately,” he says. “These calculators should be used to ascertain risk before initiating medications like as aspirin for primary CVD prevention.” The study notes that future efforts should focus on incorporating the delivery of appropriate and inappropriate evidence-based management of CVD risk factors when considering the use of aspirin.

 

 

Readings & Resources (click to view)

Hira RS, Kennedy K, Nambi V, et al. Frequency and practice-level variation in inappropriate aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: insights from the National Cardiovascular Disease Registry’s Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:111-121. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109714069411.

Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2889-2934.

Campbell CL, Smyth S, Montalescot G, Steinhubl SR. Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;297:2018-2024.

Subherwal S, Patel MR, Tang F, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the use of cardioprotective medications among patients with peripheral artery disease: an analysis of the American College of Cardiology’s NCDR PINNACLE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:51-57.

Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2432-2446.

Hira RS, Kennedy K, Jneid H, et al. Frequency and practice level variation in inappropriate and non-recommended prasugrel prescribing: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2876-2877.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × 4 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]