Advertisement

 

 

Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert Test in Tuberculosis Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Author Information (click to view)

Kaur R, Kachroo K, Sharma JK, Vatturi SM, Dang A,


Kaur R, Kachroo K, Sharma JK, Vatturi SM, Dang A, (click to view)

Kaur R, Kachroo K, Sharma JK, Vatturi SM, Dang A,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Journal of global infectious diseases 8(1) 32-40 doi 10.4103/0974-777X.176143

Abstract
BACKGROUND
World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and detection of rifampicin resistance. This systematic review was done to know about the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.

METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar for relevant studies for studies published between 2010 and December 2014. Studies given in the systematic reviews were accessed separately and used for analysis. Selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of quality of included studies was performed independently by two reviewers. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay among adult or predominantly adult patients (≥14 years), presumed to have pulmonary TB with or without HIV infection were included in the review. Also, studies that had assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay using sputum and other respiratory specimens were included.

RESULTS
The included studies had a low risk of any form of bias, showing that findings are of high scientific validity and credibility. Quantitative analysis of 37 included studies shows that Xpert MTB/RIF is an accurate diagnostic test for TB and detection of rifampicin resistance.

CONCLUSION
Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a robust, sensitive and specific test for accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis as compared to conventional tests like culture and microscopic examination.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fourteen − seven =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]