Advertisement

 

 

Impact of a systems engineering intervention on PMTCT service delivery in Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Mozambique: a cluster randomized trial.

Author Information (click to view)

Rustagi AS, Gimbel S, Nduati R, Cuembelo MF, Wasserheit JN, Farquhar C, Gloyd S, Sherr K, ,


Rustagi AS, Gimbel S, Nduati R, Cuembelo MF, Wasserheit JN, Farquhar C, Gloyd S, Sherr K, , (click to view)

Rustagi AS, Gimbel S, Nduati R, Cuembelo MF, Wasserheit JN, Farquhar C, Gloyd S, Sherr K, ,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2016 4 14()

Abstract
BACKGROUND
Efficacious interventions to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) have not translated well into effective programs. Prior studies of systems engineering applications to PMTCT lacked comparison groups or randomization.

METHODS
Thirty-six health facilities in Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, and Mozambique were randomized to usual care or a systems engineering intervention, stratified by country and volume. The intervention guided facility staff to iteratively identify and then rectify barriers to PMTCT implementation. Registry data quantified coverage of HIV testing during first antenatal care visit, antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV-positive pregnant women, and screening HIV-exposed infants (HEI) for HIV by 6-8 weeks. We compared the change between baseline (January 2013-January 2014) and post-intervention (January-March 2015) periods using t-tests. All analyses were intent-to-treat.

RESULTS
ARV coverage increased 3-fold (+13.3 percentage points [95% CI: 0.5, 26.0] in intervention vs. +4.1 [-12.6, 20.7] in control facilities) and HEI screening increased 17-fold (+11.6 [-2.6, 25.7] in intervention vs. +0.7 [-12.9, 14.4] in control facilities). In pre-specified sub-group analyses, ARV coverage increased significantly in Kenya (+20.9 [-3.1, 44.9] in intervention vs. -21.2 [-52.7, 10.4] in controls; p=0.02). HEI screening increased significantly in Mozambique (+23.1 [10.3, 35.8] in intervention vs. +3.7 [-13.1, 20.6] in controls; p=0.04). HIV testing did not differ significantly between arms.

CONCLUSIONS
In this first randomized trial of systems engineering to improve PMTCT, we saw substantially larger improvements in ARV coverage and HEI screening in intervention facilities compared to controls, which were significant in pre-specified sub-groups. Systems engineering could strengthen PMTCT service delivery and protect infants from HIV.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

16 − 8 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]