Advertisement

 

 

Improving Surgical Decision Making

Improving Surgical Decision Making
Author Information (click to view)

Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS

Associate Professor of Surgery

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health

Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that she has or has had no financial interests to report.

+


Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS (click to view)

Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS

Associate Professor of Surgery

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health

Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that she has or has had no financial interests to report.

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Researchers have developed and tested a tool designed to address the core decisional and informational needs of older surgical patients. The tool may improve patient engagement and reduce postoperative treatment regret and conflict about post-surgical treatments.

About 500,000 Americans aged 65 and older will have a high-risk operation, such as heart bypass or major cancer surgery, each year.

“Many patients will benefit from these procedures, but they carry significant potential for mortality and serious complications, particularly for older adults with multiple comorbidities,” explains Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, FACS. High-risk surgery can also lead to other unintended consequences, such as postoperative suffering, conflict about additional aggressive treatments, and receipt of unwanted interventions.

Surgeons play an important role helping patients make preference-sensitive decisions, but they can sometimes miss opportunities to have these discussions. “Although patients generally prefer being involved in decision making, they frequently do not know how best to engage in the process with their surgeons,” Dr. Schwarze says. Studies indicate that patients actively engaged in the decision-making process are more likely to receive patient-focused care. This activation is especially important for older patients because they tend to be less likely to ask questions and are less effective in ensuring that physicians attend to their concerns.

In previous research, standardized question prompt lists (QPLs) have been shown to effectively improve patient engagement in other setting. Several QPL tools are available, but Dr. Schwarze says greater efforts are needed to improve patient engagement in surgical decision making. “We need to bridge the gap between patients’ needs to make the consequences of surgery relevant to their lives and surgeons’ goals of setting realistic expectations,” she says.

Testing a New Tool

For a study published in JAMA Surgery, Dr. Schwarze and colleagues designed a preoperative decision making intervention to generate a QPL. The authors formalized a partnership with patients, family members, and researchers, collaborating with their Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) to develop a QPL to help older adults with high-stakes surgical decisions. The PFAC included four men and women who had previous experience with high-risk surgery as older patients or their family members. The group met monthly to examine findings from a prior study of surgeon-patient communication and to integrate themes with members’ experiences.

In total, the research team observed 91 recorded conversations between patients and surgeons and 61 patient interviews before and after surgery. PFAC members and other stakeholders evaluated 118 publicly available questions and selected 11 that specifically corresponded to their needs in order to generate a QPL.

“Our study revealed that patients believed that the need for surgery was absolute, were surprised that postoperative recovery was difficult, and lacked knowledge about perioperative advance care planning,” says Dr. Schwarze. The PFAC identified a need for more information and decisional support during preoperative conversations. Several specific areas were identified, including clarifying treatment options, establishing postoperative expectations, and addressing advance care plans.

A Helpful Intervention

The study team concluded that three overarching question categories could be used to improve doctor-patient discussions (Figure below). Within each of these categories, there were several questions that patients could ask specifically to help them in their decision-making process. “Importantly, the intervention is accompanied by a supportive letter from the surgeon,” adds Dr. Schwarze. “This reinforces the surgeon’s support for patient participation in decision making and can encourage patients to think about matters that are truly relevant to their overall values and goals.”

newchart

An important strength of the study, according to Dr. Schwarze, is that it identified key elements of importance for informed decision making. “Our low-tech, low-cost intervention may help us better communicate with patients about treatment options, clarify the goals of surgery, and prepare patients for both expected and unexpected outcomes,” she says. “We hope that our intervention will help rectify gaps in communication that often don’t get covered by the traditional informed consent processes.”

Important Implications

The results have important implications for surgeons, patients, and their family members. Surgeons will need to translate their notions of risks and benefits into patient-centered outcomes, specifically with regard to goals and expectations. “The QPL questions are framed in a way that can help patients access the surgeon’s knowledge in a way that they can understand,” says Dr. Schwarze. “The QPL also addresses specific needs that patients and families may not know to ask about.” For family members, the question list provides an opportunity to discuss the patient’s views on life-supporting treatment and advance directives.

“Importantly, our study participants understood that they did not need to ask every question in the QPL,” Dr. Schwarze says. “Ultimately, our QPL intervention can serve as a tool for surgeons to help older adults who are considering high-risk surgery. Ideally, it can help activate patients and family members during surgical consultations to ensure that they really understand their treatment options and to prepare them for all types of outcomes they may experience.”

Readings & Resources (click to view)

Steffens NM, Tucholka JL, Nabozny MJ, Schmick AE, Brasel KJ, Schwarze ML. Engaging patients, health care professionals, and community members to improve preoperative decision making for older adults facing high-risk surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 29 [Epub ahead of print]. Available at: http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2530197.

SchwarzeML, Barnato AE, Rathouz PJ, et al. Development of a list of high-risk operations for patients 65 years and older. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:325-331.

Schwarze ML, Bradley CT, Brasel KJ. Surgical “buy-in”: the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:843-848.

Schwarze ML, Redmann AJ, Alexander GC, Brasel KJ. Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively: results of a national survey. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1-8.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 + sixteen =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]