Advertisement

 

 

Infographic: Best & Worst Cities for an Active Lifestyle

Infographic: Best & Worst Cities for an Active Lifestyle
Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

With “lose weight and get fit” being both the most popular and most commonly broken New Year’s resolution, and the level of inactivity among Americans aged 6 and older decreasing from 28.3% in 2014 to 27.7% in 2015, the personal finance website WalletHub took an in-depth look at 2017’s Best & Worst Cities for an Active Lifestyle.

To identify the cities that encourage balancing a healthy diet with ample physical activity, analysts compared the 100 most populated U.S. cities across 30 key metrics. The data set ranges from “average monthly fitness-club fee” to “bike score” to “share of physically inactive residents.”

exercise-cities2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other key findings from the study include:

85.3: Orlando, FL has the most sporting-good stores per 100,000 residents, which is 50 times more than Greensboro, NC.

127.5: Scottsdale, AZ has the most public golf courses per 1 million residents, which is 90 times more than New York City.

156.15: Madison, WI has the most fitness  trainers and aerobics instructors per 100,000 residents, which is 6.8 times more than Bakersfield, CA.

229.48: Scottsdale, AZ has  the most fitness  centers per 100,000 residents, which is 37.7 times more than Greensboro, NC.

71.98: Madison, WI has the most park playgrounds per 100,000 residents, which is 14.1 times more than Hialeah, FL.

 

See the entire list of cities ranked 1-100 here.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × 3 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]