Advertisement

 

 

Public/community engagement in health research with men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities.

Author Information (click to view)

Molyneux S, Sariola S, Allman D, Dijkstra M, Gichuru E, Graham S, Kamuya D, Gakii G, Kayemba B, Kombo B, Maleche A, Mbwambo J, Marsh V, Micheni M, Mumba N, Parker M, Shio J, Yah C, van der Elst E, Sanders E,


Molyneux S, Sariola S, Allman D, Dijkstra M, Gichuru E, Graham S, Kamuya D, Gakii G, Kayemba B, Kombo B, Maleche A, Mbwambo J, Marsh V, Micheni M, Mumba N, Parker M, Shio J, Yah C, van der Elst E, Sanders E, (click to view)

Molyneux S, Sariola S, Allman D, Dijkstra M, Gichuru E, Graham S, Kamuya D, Gakii G, Kayemba B, Kombo B, Maleche A, Mbwambo J, Marsh V, Micheni M, Mumba N, Parker M, Shio J, Yah C, van der Elst E, Sanders E,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Health research policy and systems / BioMed Central 2016 5 2714(1) 40

Abstract
BACKGROUND
Community engagement, incorporating elements of the broader concepts of public and stakeholder engagement, is increasingly promoted globally, including for health research conducted in developing countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, community engagement needs and challenges are arguably intensified for studies involving gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, where male same-sex sexual interactions are often highly stigmatised and even illegal. This paper contextualises, describes and interprets the discussions and outcomes of an international meeting held at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust in Kilifi, Kenya, in November 2013, to critically examine the experiences with community engagement for studies involving men who have sex with men.

DISCUSSION
We discuss the ethically charged nature of the language used for men who have sex with men, and of working with ‘representatives’ of these communities, as well as the complementarity and tensions between a broadly public health approach to community engagement, and a more rights based approach. We highlight the importance of researchers carefully considering which communities to engage with, and the goals, activities, and indicators of success and potential challenges for each. We suggest that, given the unintended harms that can emerge from community engagement (including through labelling, breaches in confidentiality, increased visibility and stigma, and threats to safety), representatives of same-sex populations should be consulted from the earliest possible stage, and that engagement activities should be continuously revised in response to unfolding realities. Engagement should also include less vocal and visible men who have sex with men, and members of other communities with influence on the research, and on research participants and their families and friends. Broader ethics support, advice and research into studies involving men who have sex with men is needed to ensure that ethical challenges – including but not limited to those related to community engagement – are identified and addressed. Underlying challenges and dilemmas linked to stigma and discrimination of men who have sex with men in Africa raise special responsibilities for researchers. Community engagement is an important way of identifying responses to these challenges and responsibilities but itself presents important ethical challenges.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 − eight =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]