Outcomes for proximal aortic replacement appear to be excellent for elective repair, but research suggests that results deteriorate for non-elective procedures. Better screening and perhaps lowering thresholds for elective intervention could improve outcomes.
A framework of ethical and operational principles may help emergency physicians adjust to the demands and limited resources that they face during disasters.
An expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outlines who should be performing TAVR and patient selection for the procedure.
The role of palliative care is distinct from that of oncology, but the entities are complementary. Determining the best ways to integrate these two types of care is paramount to optimizing patient outcomes.