Advertisement

 

 

A challenge to unqualified medical confidentiality.

A challenge to unqualified medical confidentiality.
Author Information (click to view)

Bozzo A,


Bozzo A, (click to view)

Bozzo A,

Advertisement

Journal of medical ethics 2017 10 10() pii 10.1136/medethics-2017-104359

Abstract

Medical personnel sometimes face a seeming conflict between a duty to respect patient confidentiality and a duty to warn or protect endangered third parties. The conventional answer to dilemmas of this sort is that, in certain circumstances, medical professionals have an obligation to breach confidentiality. Kenneth Kipnis has argued, however, that the conventional wisdom on the nature of medical confidentiality is mistaken. Kipnis argues that the obligation to respect patient confidentiality is unqualified or absolute, since unqualified policies can save more lives in the long run. In this paper, I identify the form of Kipnis’s argument and present a challenge to it. I conclude that, as matters stand now, a qualified confidentiality policy is the more rational choice.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × three =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]