Advertisement

 

 

Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: A meta-analysis of observational studies: Predictive accuracy of qSOFA: A meta-analysis.

Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: A meta-analysis of observational studies: Predictive accuracy of qSOFA: A meta-analysis.
Author Information (click to view)

Maitra S, Som A, Bhattacharjee S,


Maitra S, Som A, Bhattacharjee S, (click to view)

Maitra S, Som A, Bhattacharjee S,

Advertisement

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2018 03 29() pii S1198-743X(18)30294-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To identify sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection.

METHODS
This meta-analysis followed MOOSE consensus statement for conducting and reporting the results of systematic review. PubMed & EMBASE were searched for the observational studies which reported predictive utility of qSOFA score for predicting mortality in patients with suspected or proven infection with the following search words: ‘qSOFA’, ‘q-SOFA’, ‘quick- SOFA’, ‘Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment’, ‘quick SOFA’. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) with 95% confidence interval of qSOFA and SIRS criteria for predicting in-hospital mortality was collected for each study and a 2×2 table was created for each study.

RESULTS
Data of 406802 patients from 45 observational studies have been included in this meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) of qSOFA≥2 for predicting mortality in patients who are not in intensive care unit (ICU) is 0.48(0.41- 0.55) and 0.83(0.78- 0.87) respectively. Pooled sensitivity (95% CI) of qSOFA ≥2 for predicting mortality in patients (both ICU and non- ICU setting) with suspected infection is 0.56(0.47- 0.65) and pooled specificity (95% CI) is 0.78(0.71-0.83).

CONCLUSION
qSOFA has been found to be a poorly sensitive predictive marker for in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection. It is reasonable to recommend developing another scoring system with higher sensitivity to identify high-risk patients with infection.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ten + 16 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]