Advertisement

 

 

Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Information (click to view)

Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, Jüni P,


Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, Jüni P, (click to view)

Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, Jüni P,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

BMJ open 2017 02 177(2) e013670 doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Financial incentives may encourage private for-profit providers to perform more caesarean section (CS) than non-profit hospitals. We therefore sought to determine the association of for-profit status of hospital and odds of CS.

DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the first year of records through February 2016.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
To be eligible, studies had to report data to allow the calculation of ORs of CS comparing private for-profit hospitals with public or private non-profit hospitals in a specific geographic area.

OUTCOMES
The prespecified primary outcome was the adjusted OR of births delivered by CS in private for-profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals; the prespecified secondary outcome was the crude OR of CS in private for-profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals.

RESULTS
15 articles describing 17 separate studies in 4.1 million women were included. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, the adjusted odds of delivery by CS was 1.41 higher in for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals (95% CI 1.24 to 1.60) with no relevant heterogeneity between studies (τ(2)≤0.037). Findings were robust across subgroups of studies in stratified analyses. The meta-analysis of crude estimates from 16 studies revealed a somewhat more pronounced association (pooled OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.27) with moderate-to-high heterogeneity between studies (τ(2)≥0.179).

CONCLUSIONS
CS are more likely to be performed by for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals. This holds true regardless of women’s risk and contextual factors such as country, year or study design. Since financial incentives are likely to play an important role, we recommend examination of incentive structures of for-profit hospitals to identify strategies that encourage appropriate provision of CS.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ten + sixteen =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]