Advertisement

 

 

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Information (click to view)

Pisarska M, Małczak P, Major P, Wysocki M, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M,


Pisarska M, Małczak P, Major P, Wysocki M, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M, (click to view)

Pisarska M, Małczak P, Major P, Wysocki M, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

PloS one 2017 03 2812(3) e0174382 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0174382
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol are well established in many surgical disciplines, leading to decrease in morbidity and length of hospital stay. These multi-modal protocols have been also introduced to oesophageal cancer surgery. This review aimed to evaluate current literature on ERAS in oesophageal cancer surgery and conduct a meta-analysis on primary and secondary outcomes.

METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. We analyzed data up to May 2016. Eligible studies had to contain four described ERAS protocol elements. The primary outcome was overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, specific complications, mortality and readmissions. Random effect meta-analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS
Initial search yielded 1,064 articles. Thorough evaluation resulted in 13 eligible articles which were analyzed. A total of 2,042 patients were included in the analysis (1,058 ERAS group and 984 treated with traditional protocols). Analysis of overall morbidity as well as complication rate did not show any significant reduction. Non-surgical complications and pulmonary complications were significantly lower in the ERAS group, RR = 0.71 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.00001 and RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01, respectively. Meta-analysis on length of stay presented significant reduction Mean difference = -3.55, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.69, p for effect<0.00001. CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review with a meta-analysis on ERAS in oesophageal surgery indicates a reduction of non-surgical complications and no negative influence on overall morbidity. Moreover, a reduction in the length of hospital stay was presented.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 3 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]