Advertisement

 

 

Estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure from radial systolic and diastolic blood pressures alone using artificial neural networks.

Estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure from radial systolic and diastolic blood pressures alone using artificial neural networks.
Author Information (click to view)

Xiao H, Qasem A, Butlin M, Avolio A,


Xiao H, Qasem A, Butlin M, Avolio A, (click to view)

Xiao H, Qasem A, Butlin M, Avolio A,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Journal of hypertension 2017 03 06() doi 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001337
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Current aortic SBP estimation methods require recording of a peripheral pressure waveform, a step with no consensus on method. This study investigates the possibility of aortic SBP estimation from radial SBP and DBP using artificial neural networks (ANN) with [ANNSBP.DBP.heart rate (HR)] and without HR (ANNSBP.DBP).

METHODS
Ten-fold cross validation was applied to invasive, simultaneously recorded aortic and radial pressure during rest and nitroglycerin infusion (n = 62 patients). The results of the ANN models were compared with an ANN model using additional waveform features (ANNwaveform), to an N-point moving average method (NPMA) and to existing, validated generalized transfer function (GTF).

RESULTS
Estimated aortic SBP for all methods was on average less than 1 mmHg away from measured aortic SBP with the exception of NPMA (difference 2.0 ± 3.5 mmHg, P = 0.62). Variability of the difference was significantly greater in ANNSBP.DBP.HR and ANNSBP.DBP (both SD of ± 5.9 mmHg, P < 0.001 compared with GTF, ± 4.0 mmHg, P < 0.001). Inclusion of waveform features decreased the variability (ANNwaveform ± 3.9 mmHg, P = 0.264). Estimated aortic SBP in all models was correlated with measured SBP, with ANN models providing statistically similar results to the GTF method, only the NPMA being statistically different (P = 0.031). CONCLUSION
These findings indicate that use of radial SBP, DBP, and HR alone can provide aortic SBP estimation comparable with the GTF, albeit with slightly greater variance. Pending noninvasive validation, the technique provides plausible aortic SBP estimation without waveform analysis.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fourteen + fourteen =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]