Advertisement

 

 

Evaluation of a multiplex panel for the diagnosis of acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompromised hematologic patients.

Evaluation of a multiplex panel for the diagnosis of acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompromised hematologic patients.
Author Information (click to view)

Alejo-Cancho I, Fernández Avilés F, Capón A, Rodríguez C, Barrachina J, Salvador P, Valls ME, Álvarez-Martínez MJ, Zboromyrska Y, Vila J, Marcos MÁ,


Alejo-Cancho I, Fernández Avilés F, Capón A, Rodríguez C, Barrachina J, Salvador P, Valls ME, Álvarez-Martínez MJ, Zboromyrska Y, Vila J, Marcos MÁ, (click to view)

Alejo-Cancho I, Fernández Avilés F, Capón A, Rodríguez C, Barrachina J, Salvador P, Valls ME, Álvarez-Martínez MJ, Zboromyrska Y, Vila J, Marcos MÁ,

Advertisement

PloS one 2017 11 0312(11) e0187458 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0187458
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Diarrhea is a frequent complication in hematologic patients, being an infectious cause frequently suspected. Rapid and accurate detection of gastrointestinal pathogens is vital in immunocompromised hosts. The aim of this study was to compare routine diagnostic methods versus a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea in immunocompromised hematologic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a prospective observational study from March 2015 to January 2016 to compare conventional methods for the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea with FIlmArray GI Panel (BioFire-bioMérieux, France). Samples from adult immunocompromised hematologic patients with acute diarrhea were collected. In cases with discordant results, a second multiplex assay was performed (Allplex, Seegene, Korea). The result was considered positive or negative when the same result was obtained by at least two of the methods.

RESULTS
A total of 95 samples were obtained from 95 patients (median age of 52 years (46-64)). Sixty-one (64%) episodes were hospital-acquired and 34 (36%) were community-acquired diarrhea. Twenty-five (26%) patients had a positive microbiological result, being Clostridium difficile the most frequent pathogen, followed by Campylobacter spp and norovirus. The concordance between FilmArray methods was good (k = 0.79). The FilmArray GI panel showed a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 100% for positive results. The time required to obtain results was markedly reduced with the use of multiplex PCR methods.

CONCLUSIONS
Multiplex molecular panels provide a rapid and sensitive tool for the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea, thereby allowing more timely clinical decisions in immunocompromised hematologic patients.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 + 6 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]