Advertisement

 

 

Evaluation of a practical expert defined approach to patient population segmentation: a case study in Singapore.

Evaluation of a practical expert defined approach to patient population segmentation: a case study in Singapore.
Author Information (click to view)

Low LL, Kwan YH, Liu N, Jing X, Low ECT, Thumboo J,


Low LL, Kwan YH, Liu N, Jing X, Low ECT, Thumboo J, (click to view)

Low LL, Kwan YH, Liu N, Jing X, Low ECT, Thumboo J,

Advertisement

BMC health services research 2017 11 2317(1) 771 doi 10.1186/s12913-017-2736-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Segmenting the population into groups that are relatively homogeneous in healthcare characteristics or needs is crucial to facilitate integrated care and resource planning. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of segmenting the population into discrete, non-overlapping groups using a practical expert and literature driven approach. We hypothesized that this approach is feasible utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) in SingHealth.

METHODS
In addition to well-defined segments of "Mostly healthy", "Serious acute illness but curable" and "End of life" segments that are also present in the Ministry of Health Singapore framework, patients with chronic diseases were segmented into "Stable chronic disease", "Complex chronic diseases without frequent hospital admissions", and "Complex chronic diseases with frequent hospital admissions". Using the electronic health record (EHR), we applied this framework to all adult patients who had a healthcare encounter in the Singapore Health Services Regional Health System in 2012. ICD-9, 10 and polyclinic codes were used to define chronic diseases with a comprehensive look-back period of 5 years. Outcomes (hospital admissions, emergency attendances, specialist outpatient clinic attendances and mortality) were analyzed for years 2012 to 2015.

RESULTS
Eight hundred twenty five thousand eight hundred seventy four patients were included in this study with the majority being healthy without chronic diseases. The most common chronic disease was hypertension. Patients with "complex chronic disease" with frequent hospital admissions segment represented 0.6% of the eligible population, but accounted for the highest hospital admissions (4.33 ± 2.12 admissions; p < 0.001) and emergency attendances (ED) (3.21 ± 3.16 ED visits; p < 0.001) per patient, and a high mortality rate (16%). Patients with metastatic disease accounted for the highest specialist outpatient clinic attendances (27.48 ± 23.68 visits; p < 0.001) per patient despite their relatively shorter course of illness and high one-year mortality rate (33%). CONCLUSION
This practical segmentation framework can potentially distinguish among groups of patients, and highlighted the high disease burden of patients with chronic diseases. Further research to validate this approach of population segmentation is needed.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fourteen − 3 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]