Advertisement

 

 

Glycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Glycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Information (click to view)

Hermanides J, Plummer MP, Finnis M, Deane AM, Coles JP, Menon DK,


Hermanides J, Plummer MP, Finnis M, Deane AM, Coles JP, Menon DK, (click to view)

Hermanides J, Plummer MP, Finnis M, Deane AM, Coles JP, Menon DK,

Advertisement

Critical care (London, England) 2018 01 1922(1) 11 doi 10.1186/s13054-017-1883-y
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Optimal glycaemic targets in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensive with conventional glycaemic control in TBI requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to November 2016. Outcomes of interest included ICU and in-hospital mortality, poor neurological outcome, the incidence of hypoglycaemia and infective complications. Data were analysed by pairwise random effects models with secondary analysis of differing levels of conventional glycaemic control.

RESULTS
Ten RCTs, involving 1066 TBI patients were included. Three studies were conducted exclusively in a TBI population, whereas in seven trials, the TBI population was a sub-cohort of a mixed neurocritical or general ICU population. Glycaemic targets with intensive control ranged from 4.4 to 6.7 mmol/L, while conventional targets aimed to keep glucose levels below thresholds of 8.4-12 mmol/L. Conventional versus intensive control showed no association with ICU or hospital mortality (relative risk (RR) (95% CI) 0.93 (0.68-1.27), P = 0.64 and 1.07 (0.84-1.36), P = 0.62, respectively). The risk of a poor neurological outcome was higher with conventional control (RR (95% CI) = 1.10 (1.001-1.24), P = 0.047). However, severe hypoglycaemia occurred less frequently with conventional control (RR (95% CI) = 0.22 (0.09-0.52), P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis of intensive glycaemic control shows no association with reduced mortality in TBI. Intensive glucose control showed a borderline significant reduction in the risk of poor neurological outcome, but markedly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. These contradictory findings should motivate further research.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 − seventeen =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]