Advertisement

 

 

Innovative treatment modalities for urinary incontinence: a European survey identifying experience and attitude of healthcare providers.

Innovative treatment modalities for urinary incontinence: a European survey identifying experience and attitude of healthcare providers.
Author Information (click to view)

Kastelein AW, Dicker MFA, Opmeer BC, Angles SS, Raatikainen KE, Alonso JF, Tăut D, Airaksinen O, Cardozo LD, Roovers JWR, ,


Kastelein AW, Dicker MFA, Opmeer BC, Angles SS, Raatikainen KE, Alonso JF, Tăut D, Airaksinen O, Cardozo LD, Roovers JWR, , (click to view)

Kastelein AW, Dicker MFA, Opmeer BC, Angles SS, Raatikainen KE, Alonso JF, Tăut D, Airaksinen O, Cardozo LD, Roovers JWR, ,

Advertisement

International urogynecology journal 2017 04 21() doi 10.1007/s00192-017-3339-y
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
Urinary incontinence is a common condition in women, with a reported prevalence ranging from 25% to 51%. Of these women, an estimated 38% suffer from stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A European research consortium is investigating an innovative system based on information and communication technology for the conservative treatment of women with SUI. When introducing a new intervention, implementation barriers arise and need to be identified. Therefore, we investigated healthcare providers’ experience with and attitude towards innovative care options.

METHODS
We performed an online survey to assess (1) the characteristics and practice of healthcare providers, (2) current protocols for SUI, (3) current use of biofeedback, and (4) knowledge about serious gaming. The survey was sent to members of professional societies in Europe (EUGA), UK (BSUG) and The Netherlands (DPFS).

RESULTS
Of 341 questionnaires analyzed (response rate between 18% and 30%), 64% of the respondents had access to a protocol for the treatment of SUI, and 31% used biofeedback when treating patients with SUI. However, 92% considered that biofeedback has a clear or probable added value, and 97% of those who did not use biofeedback would change their practice if research evidence supported its use. Finally, 89% of respondents indicated that they had no experience of serious gaming, but 92% considered that it could be useful.

CONCLUSIONS
Although inexperienced, European urogynecologists and physical therapists welcome innovative treatment options for the conservative treatment of SUI such as portable wireless biofeedback and serious gaming. Scientific evidence is considered a prerequisite to incorporate such innovations into clinical practice.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 − 3 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]