This study focuses on The ideal careful treatment of long head of biceps pathology is indistinct. This audit assesses Level I contemplates contrasting tenotomy and tenodesis for the administration of long head of biceps pathology.
Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library data sets were looked from information base beginning however April 17, 2020. Clinical results including Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) shoulder score, torment on visual simple scale, postoperative strength, and Popeye disfigurement were assessed. Dichotomous results were pooled into relative danger proportions while ceaseless results were pooled into weighted mean contrasts utilizing arbitrary impacts meta-examination.
An aggregate of 5 examinations (227 tenotomy and 227 tenodesis patients) met the last consideration measures. Postoperative improvement across all results was noticed paying little heed to careful treatment. Pooled examination exhibited no measurably huge contrast for Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score, ASES, torment, or flexion strength. Tenodesis was better than tenotomy in decreasing the danger of Popeye distortion (relative danger proportion 3.07, certainty span 1.87, 5.02; P < .001).
Reference link- https://www.jshoulderelbow.org/article/S1058-2746(21)00105-1/fulltext