Advertisement

 

 

New psychometric data from the Spanish versions of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale measures.

New psychometric data from the Spanish versions of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale measures.
Author Information (click to view)

Orive M, Antón-Ladislao A, González N, Matellanes B, Padierna JÁ, Cabriada JL, Orive A, Manuel Orive V, Quintana JM,


Orive M, Antón-Ladislao A, González N, Matellanes B, Padierna JÁ, Cabriada JL, Orive A, Manuel Orive V, Quintana JM, (click to view)

Orive M, Antón-Ladislao A, González N, Matellanes B, Padierna JÁ, Cabriada JL, Orive A, Manuel Orive V, Quintana JM,

Advertisement
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva 2017 11 16110() doi 10.17235/reed.2017.4911/2017
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
There are no structural abnormalities in functional dyspepsia, therefore it is essential to have a viable questionnaire to measure treatment outcome according to patient perception. The aim of the study was to extensively document psychometric characteristics of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale that are currently available in Spanish.

METHODS
Patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 158) were recruited from a randomized trial that assessed standard vs. standard and psychological treatment. Participants had completed the validation questionnaires and the Medical Outcome Study Short-form 36. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), validity (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent and known group validity) and responsiveness (minimal clinically important difference) were analyzed.

RESULTS
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score showed a one-factor solution model, but a low Cronbach’s alpha (0.61). With regard to the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale, the Cronbach’s alpha (0.80-0.97) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a model with four inter-correlated dimensions and suggested a need to improve the "Satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health" dimension (Cronbach’s alpha < 20). Finally, the global scores for both the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale were responsive at six months post-treatment, with a minimal clinically important difference of 4 and 6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support the continued application of the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale and the need to improve the "Satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health" dimension. Although the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score is a promising questionnaire, further review of the content is required to eliminate and add items in order to provide greater consistency to the evaluated construct.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

17 + nine =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]