Advertisement

 

 

Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).

Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).
Author Information (click to view)

Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Roderick PJ, Venn R, Forni LG,


Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Roderick PJ, Venn R, Forni LG, (click to view)

Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Roderick PJ, Venn R, Forni LG,

Advertisement

BMJ open 2017 03 087(3) e013511 doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013511
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) is associated with a high risk of mortality. Prediction models or rules may identify those most at risk of HA-AKI. This study externally validated one of the few clinical prediction rules (CPRs) derived in a general medicine cohort using clinical information and data from an acute hospitals electronic system on admission: the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
External validation in a single UK non-specialist acute hospital (2013-2015, 12 554 episodes); four cohorts: adult medical and general surgical populations, with and without a known preadmission baseline serum creatinine (SCr).

METHODS
Performance assessed by discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) and calibration.

RESULTS
HA-AKI incidence within 7 days (kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) change in SCr) was 8.1% (n=409) of medical patients with known baseline SCr, 6.6% (n=141) in those without a baseline, 4.9% (n=204) in surgical patients with baseline and 4% (n=49) in those without. Across the four cohorts AUCROC were: medical with known baseline 0.65 (95% CIs 0.62 to 0.67) and no baseline 0.71 (0.67 to 0.75), surgical with baseline 0.66 (0.62 to 0.70) and no baseline 0.68 (0.58 to 0.75). For calibration, in medicine and surgical cohorts with baseline SCr, Hosmer-Lemeshow p values were non-significant, suggesting acceptable calibration. In the medical cohort, at a cut-off of five points on the APS to predict HA-AKI, positive predictive value was 16% (13-18%) and negative predictive value 94% (93-94%). Of medical patients with HA-AKI, those with an APS ≥5 had a significantly increased risk of death (28% vs 18%, OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.9), p=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS
On external validation the APS on admission shows moderate discrimination and acceptable calibration to predict HA-AKI and may be useful as a severity marker when HA-AKI occurs. Harnessing linked data from primary care may be one way to achieve more accurate risk prediction.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × two =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]