Advertisement

 

 

Quantification of mutant SPOP proteins in prostate cancer using mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics.

Quantification of mutant SPOP proteins in prostate cancer using mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics.
Author Information (click to view)

Wang H, Barbieri CE, He J, Gao Y, Shi T, Wu C, Schepmoes AA, Fillmore TL, Chae SS, Huang D, Mosquera JM, Qian WJ, Smith RD, Srivastava S, Kagan J, Camp DG, Rodland KD, Rubin MA, Liu T,


Wang H, Barbieri CE, He J, Gao Y, Shi T, Wu C, Schepmoes AA, Fillmore TL, Chae SS, Huang D, Mosquera JM, Qian WJ, Smith RD, Srivastava S, Kagan J, Camp DG, Rodland KD, Rubin MA, Liu T, (click to view)

Wang H, Barbieri CE, He J, Gao Y, Shi T, Wu C, Schepmoes AA, Fillmore TL, Chae SS, Huang D, Mosquera JM, Qian WJ, Smith RD, Srivastava S, Kagan J, Camp DG, Rodland KD, Rubin MA, Liu T,

Advertisement

Journal of translational medicine 2017 08 1515(1) 175 doi 10.1186/s12967-017-1276-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor protein that functions as a potential tumor suppressor, and SPOP mutations have been identified in ~10% of human prostate cancers. However, it remains unclear if mutant SPOP proteins can be utilized as biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis or targeted therapy of prostate cancer. Moreover, the SPOP mutation sites are distributed in a relatively short region with multiple lysine residues, posing significant challenges for bottom-up proteomics analysis of the SPOP mutations.

METHODS
To address this issue, PRISM (high-pressure, high-resolution separations coupled with intelligent selection and multiplexing)-SRM (selected reaction monitoring) mass spectrometry assays have been developed for quantifying wild-type SPOP protein and 11 prostate cancer-derived SPOP mutations.

RESULTS
Despite inherent limitations due to amino acid sequence constraints, all the PRISM-SRM assays developed using Arg-C digestion showed a linear dynamic range of at least two orders of magnitude, with limits of quantification ranged from 0.1 to 1 fmol/μg of total protein in the cell lysate. Applying these SRM assays to analyze HEK293T cells with and without expression of the three most frequent SPOP mutations in prostate cancer (Y87N, F102C or F133V) led to confident detection of all three SPOP mutations in corresponding positive cell lines but not in the negative cell lines. Expression of the F133V mutation and wild-type SPOP was at much lower levels compared to that of F102C and Y87N mutations; however, at present, it is unknown if this also affects the biological activity of the SPOP protein.

CONCLUSIONS
In summary, PRISM-SRM enables multiplexed, isoform-specific detection of mutant SPOP proteins in cell lysates, providing significant potential in biomarker development for prostate cancer.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

four − one =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]