Advertisement

 

 

Randomised controlled trial of two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

Randomised controlled trial of two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programmes.
Author Information (click to view)

Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Geleijnse ML, Haverkamp M, Stam HJ, Boersma E, van Domburg RT,


Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Geleijnse ML, Haverkamp M, Stam HJ, Boersma E, van Domburg RT, (click to view)

Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Geleijnse ML, Haverkamp M, Stam HJ, Boersma E, van Domburg RT,

Advertisement

Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2017 09 27() pii heartjnl-2017-311681
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The OPTICARE (OPTImal CArdiac REhabilitation) randomised controlled trial compared two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes to standard CR for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These programmes were designed to stimulate permanent adoption of a heart-healthy lifestyle. The primary outcome was the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function at 18 months follow-up.

METHODS
In total, 914 patients with ACS (age, 57 years; 81% men) were randomised to: (1) 3 months standard CR (CR-only); (2) standard CR including three additional face-to-face active lifestyle counselling sessions and extended with three group fitness training and general lifestyle counselling sessions in the first 9 months after standard CR (CR+F); or (3) standard CR extended for 9 months with five to six telephone general lifestyle counselling sessions (CR+T).

RESULTS
In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no difference in the SCORE risk function at 18 months between CR+F and CR-only (3.30% vs 3.47%; p=0.48), or CR+T and CR-only (3.02% vs 3.47%; p=0.39). In a per-protocol analysis, two of three modifiable SCORE parameters favoured CR+F over CR-only: current smoking (13.4% vs 21.3%; p<0.001) and total cholesterol (3.9 vs 4.3 mmol/L; p<0.001). The smoking rate was also lower in CR+T compared with the CR-only (12.9% vs 21.3%; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS
Extending CR with extra behavioural counselling (group sessions or individual telephone sessions) does not confer additional benefits with respect to SCORE parameters. Patients largely reach target levels for modifiable risk factors with few hospital readmissions already following standard CR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01395095; results.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

four × three =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]