The following study states that There are reasons why ladies are more averse to be recommended statins than are men. The creators bring up that an insight exists that female sex offers a defensive impact against cardiovascular infection, which may bring about less forceful danger factor change for ladies. Additionally, a misconception may exist among clinicians that statins are less useful for ladies than for men. Reasons have likewise been recorded for why female sex was autonomously connected with lower statin adherence. In spite of the fact that ladies were bound to stress over coronary failure or stroke than were men, a lower extent of ladies accepted statins are protected and successful in diminishing the danger of ISVD. Ladies were likewise bound to relate statin use with muscle hurts and liver harm and, accordingly, bound to decrease and cease statins than were men. I don’t have a clue why ladies would be more outlandish than men to accept that statins are protected, however physiologic reasons could exist for why they experience more muscle hurts and liver changes.
Reference link- https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(20)32046-2/fulltext