There have been various studies that are being conducted so far in order to measure the flexible assertive community treatment which is a community-based model to cure patients who have been suffering from severe mental illness. However, there has been no evidence as until now as to what is the ratio of the effectiveness of this treatment in curing the people in the best possible manner. There have been many methods adopted in order to get the results of this point, especially in Denmark. A quasi-experiment was conducted in order to check the propensity score of the controlled FACT studies in the limited environment wherein 4085 patients were read and studied in the best possible manner, the patients were made to investigate the effectivenes of the FACT in comparison to another treatment which included the processes like CMHT and ACT team. The results so found, indicating that the FACT was not as efficient as it was expected to be, and hence, it required more analysis and better-equipped details to analyze the pinpricks. However, the most important component of this process was to ensure that the cost-effectiveness is preserved and an attempt is made to boost the efficiency of this.

Ref art: