Advertisement

 

 

The laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring: the diagnostic and potential prognostic role.

The laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring: the diagnostic and potential prognostic role.
Author Information (click to view)

El-Menyar A, Asim M, Mudali IN, Mekkodathil A, Latifi R, Al-Thani H,


El-Menyar A, Asim M, Mudali IN, Mekkodathil A, Latifi R, Al-Thani H, (click to view)

El-Menyar A, Asim M, Mudali IN, Mekkodathil A, Latifi R, Al-Thani H,

Advertisement

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2017 03 0725(1) 28 doi 10.1186/s13049-017-0359-z
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a devastating soft tissue infection associated with potentially poor outcomes. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score has been introduced as a diagnostic tool for NF. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LRINEC scoring in NF patients.

METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients who were admitted with NF between 2000 and 2013. Based on LRINEC points, patients were classified into (Group 1: LRINEC < 6 and Group 2: LRINEC ≥ 6). The 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, septic shock and hospital death. RESULTS
A total of 294 NF cases were identified with a mean age 50.9 ± 15 years. When compared to Group1, patients in Group 2 were 5 years older (p = 0.009), more likely to have diabetes mellitus (61 vs 41%, p < 0.001), Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (p = 0.004), greater Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (11.5 ± 3 vs 8 ± 2, p = 0.001), and prolonged intensive care (median 7 vs 5 days) and hospital length of stay (22 vs 11 days, p = 0.001). Septic shock (37 vs. 15%, p = 0.001) and mortality (28.8 vs. 15.0%, p = 0.005) were also significantly higher in Group 2 patients. Using Receiver operating curve, cutoff LRINEC point for mortality was 8.5 with area under the curve of 0.64. Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between LRINEC and SOFA scorings (r = 0.51, p < 0.002). DISCUSSION
Early diagnosis, simplified risk stratification and on-time management are vital to achieve better outcomes in patients with NF.

CONCLUSIONS
Beside its diagnostic role, LRINEC scoring could predict worse hospital outcomes in patients with NF and simply identify the high-risk patients. However, further prospective studies are needed to support this finding.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 5 =

[ HIDE/SHOW ]