All procedures were performed at the Instituto Oftalmológico Quirónsalud ophthalmology clinic (A Coruña, Spain).
We designed an experimental and longitudinal (1-month follow-up) study.
A total of 98 eyes of 65 participants (68.2 ± 12.2 years) were divided into two groups: 49 eyes operated with toric IOL alignment using a manual-marking technique (manual group) and another 49 eyes operated using image-guided marking (Verion group). The primary variable for comparison between both groups was cataract surgery time. Other outcomes such as toric IOL misalignment, spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were also measured.
The total cataract surgery time was 2:09 minutes shorter (p < 0.001) with the Verion system (12:12 ± 2:20) compared to the surgical procedure performed using manual marking (15:27 ± 3:04). One month after surgery, there were no statistical differences in terms of toric IOL misalignment between the Verion (3.38° ± 2.95°) and the manual group (4.66° ± 3.95°). No statistical differences were observed between groups for refractive and visual outcomes either (p ≥ 0.05).
The cataract surgery time was reduced when the procedure was assisted using the Verion system to align the IOL compared to manual marking, maintaining the same efficacy in terms of toric IOL misalignment, residual refraction, and visual acuity.
Copyright © 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.