Comparing Revascularization Methods

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR)—which combines minimally invasive left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending bypass with PCI of non-left anterior descending vessels—appears to have a quicker recovery and similar outcomes when compared with conventional CABG. A study found that mortality rates at 3 years were similar for both approaches. However, HCR was associated with lower in-hospital morbidity, a reduced need for blood transfusion use, and decreased needs for chest tube drainage. It was also associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay.

Source: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, August 2015.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nineteen + 16 =