The following is reprinted, at the request of the author, from an article originally posted in Spanish to the IntraMed website.
Intravenous vitamin C has been the object of numerous studies regarding its function as adjuvant therapy on critical
patients’ care, included ARDS of diverse etiology. In the context of a coronavirus pandemic, with an elevated
morbimortality and pressure over the sanitary system, it is of vital importance to use every available resource to
improve patients’ outcomes in an accessible and safe way. In this article, I briefly analyze the evidence around the
use of vitamin C in the critical patient and its potential benefits on admission time, intubation time and mortality on
patients affected by ARDS.
Vitamin C was discovered in the 30s by Albert Szent-Györgyi. The first therapeutic function known was to treat scurvy, first described on ship crews who couldn’t access fresh fruits and vegetables during long seasons on the sea. Later on, Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling performed numerous studies on the physiological and therapeutic effects of vitamin C, concluding that we were just beginning to understand its full potential. Humans are one of the few vertebrates that can’t synthesize vitamin C, therefore it is considered to be an essential nutrient. It’s estimated that 7% of the general population is deficient in vitamin C, but this percentage increases to 47% in admitted patients. ₍₁₎₍₂₎
Vitamin C’s enteral absorption is limited and its plasmatic levels are strictly regulated. A standard dietary intake maintains plasmatic levels around 70 ɥmol/L, but intensive oral supplementation of 3 grams a day only rises this level up to a maximum of 220 ɥmol/L. Therapeutic effects are achieved with plasmatic levels in the range of 20-49 mmol/L (100 times higher than those achieved by oral intake) only possible with intravenous infusion₍₃₎₍₄₎₍₅₎.
Evidence shows that the therapeutic effects take place with a minimum dose of 50mg/k/day and a maximum of 200mg/k/day, divided into four doses given every 6 hours. The largest randomized study performed so far, CITRIS-ALI ₍₆₎, found that vitamin C supplementation failed to modify biomarkers such as thrombomodulin, C reactive protein and organ failure scores (SOFA), but successfully reduced mortality by 16.5%, respiratory assistance requirements by 2.5 days, ICU stay by 3.2 days and hospital admission by 6.7 days, compared to placebo. This is more relevant than never in view of the worldwide shortages in beds and equipment. Some authors suggest that the reason why biomarkers weren’t modified was that the samples were taken at 96 hours, time when more severely ill patients had died and were excluded from the study (survivorship bias)₍₇₎₍₈₎. Two meta-analyses that included 685 and 147 critical patients concluded that intravenous vitamin C showed no adverse reactions, reduced the need for fluids and vasopressor support and reduced intubation time up to 25%₍₉₎₍₁₀₎.
A series of case reports on ADRS of diverse etiology (aspirative after seizures, inflammatory during a psoriasis flare-up, and viral) describes a fast improvement following vitamin C administration, even when the treatment was started after ECMO was required. In every case there was a symptomatic and radiologic improvement in 24-48 hours after the initial dose and good evolution at discharge, without signs of fibrotic sequels₍₁₁₎₍₁₂₎₍₁₃₎. Marik et. al. found a 30% mortality reduction in septic patients treated with vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine, when compared to patients treated under standard procedures. In addition, the treated group required 50% less vasopressor support than the control group₍₁₄₎.
Regarding the evidence around vitamin C’s mechanisms of action, certain preclinical findings might explain the effects observed on respiratory distress. Vitamin C down-regulates inflammatory genes and inhibits the cytokine storm responsible for the activation of pulmonary neutrophils, therefore protecting alveolar capillaries from inflammatory damage. In addition to this, it enhances alveolary fluid clearance by increasing the water transporter channel expression₍₁₅₎₍₁₆₎.
In regards to its safety, most studies report no adverse effects on large doses of vitamin C. On rare occasions, the following have been described: Hypersensitivity, oxalate urolithiasis, iron overload in haemochromatosis and anaemia among others, most of them with a prevalence less than 1%. It has also been described the inaccuracy of bedside glucometry when using vitamin C and it is advised to corroborate findings with laboratory results₍₅₎₍₁₇₎₍₁₈₎₍₁₉₎.
We live in times of incalculable need. Worldwide medical supplies are in shortage, costs threat to crush even the wealthiest of health care systems, and above all the wellbeing of millions of humans is at risk. Treatment of severe ARDS from COVID-19 is an ongoing challenge and a specific treatment could be months ahead. The evidence around vitamin C is scarce but promising. There probably never was and never will be a better time than the current to explore and make use of every possible tool that could allow us to improve patients’ prognosis and expand the body of evidence for the benefit of all.