ICAAC 2012: Comparing Approaches to Hand Hygiene Compliance

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The Particulars: The standard method for monitoring hand hygiene compliance before and after patient contact does not assess the appropriateness or risk stratification of compliance as described in the World Health Organization’s 5 Moments (5M) hand hygiene audit tool. The accuracy of monitoring compliance in prolonged episodes of patient care that involves long “strings” of hand hygiene activity is uncertain.

Data Breakdown: A study compared use of the before-and-after contact method with 5M tools during prospective audits of hand hygiene compliance in two ICUs. The research team assessed overall and per-moment rates of compliance. Overall compliance was significantly over-reported with before-and-after contact method (~9%), when compared with 5M, particularly when episodes included more than three moments. When comparing individual moments, the before-and-after contact method overestimated compliance by 4% (1 moment) to 18% (4 moments).

Take Home Pearl: When compared with 5M tools, before-and-after contact method auditing for hand hygiene compliance appears to significantly overestimate compliance.

Readings & Resources (click to view)

For more information on these studies and others that were presented at ICAAC 2012, go to


  1. ICAAC 2012 Conference Coverage | Physician's Weekly - [...] Comparing Approaches to Hand Hygiene Compliance [...]

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

seventeen + 17 =