The following observation states that the Treatment decision for urolithiasis is mostly founded on estimating stone thickness in HU on non enhanced registered tomography (NECT). Interobserver inconsistency in these estimations could have treatment results. This investigation expects to survey the spectator understanding of estimating HU and whether the utilization of a convention prompts a superior arrangement. We reflectively included 155 successive NECTs of patients with stones less than 4 mm. Five onlookers evaluated all anonymized NECTs multiple times in randomized requests. HU was estimated without guidance and hence utilizing two conventions. Conventions included utilizing bone setting, zoom, and estimating HU without the obscuration, in one or the other three (A) or one (B) hub plane. The between and intraobserver understanding was assessed utilizing the intraclass relationship coefficient (ICC). Observer understanding of HU estimation of urolithiasis without convention is as of now great yet utilizing zoom, bone setting, and estimating in a delegate plane is suggested. This convention brings about higher understanding, particularly among urologists. Estimating in three hub planes doesn’t expand understanding.

Reference link-