Dual treatment reduced need for surgery compared to misoprostol alone

In the management of missed miscarriage, pretreatment with the anti-progesterone drug mifepristone followed by the prostaglandin misoprostol was more effective than misoprostol alone, with a reduced need for surgical removal of pregnancy tissue.

In the randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled MifeMiso trial, 17% of women in the combination-treatment group failed to spontaneously pass the gestational sac within 7 days, compared to 24% of women treated with misoprostol alone.

A similar percentage of women in both groups required surgical intervention to complete the miscarriage.

Findings from the MifeMiso trial, which involved roughly 700 women treated at 28 U.K. hospitals, are consistent with several other previous trials.

The combined results make a strong case for considering mifepristone plus misoprostol as a first-line treatment for early fetal death in which pregnancy tissue is retained in the uterus, wrote researcher Justin J. Chu, PhD, of the United Kingdom’s University of Birmingham, and colleagues, in TheLancet.

“We recommend that women with missed miscarriage should be offered mifepristone pretreatment before misoprostol to increase the chance of successful miscarriage management, while reducing the need for miscarriage surgery,” they wrote, adding that clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect the evidence supporting the superiority of the combination treatment.

When the researchers combined their data with those from three previous trials, detailed in a recent Cochrane analysis, the pooled analysis showed a clear statistical benefit for mifepristone pretreatment compared to misoprostol along (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30).

In an editorial published with the study, fertility specialist Kurt Barnhart, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, agreed that the combination treatment should be considered the first-line treatment for medical management of missed miscarriage.

“The results of this study should lead to a change in practice in the UK and worldwide,” he wrote. “These high-quality data provide evidence that mifepristone pretreatment is the optimal medical approach to women with missed miscarriage.”

First trimester missed miscarriage refers to a nonviable early pregnancy where fetal tissue is retained in the uterus, in contrast to incomplete miscarriage, which refers to partial spontaneous expulsion of pregnancy tissue by the uterus.

Medical management of missed miscarriage typically involves treatment with misoprostol to induce myometrial contractions, but this treatment is not always immediately effective.

“Failure of medical management can result in more surgical procedures being done, which can be particularly undesirable to women who have chosen to have medical management,” the researchers wrote.

The women in the MifeMiso study were all diagnosed with missed miscarriage by pelvic ultrasound scan in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy and all chose to have medical management to expedite the expulsion of pregnancy tissue.

The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a single dose of oral mifepristone 200 mg or an oral placebo tablet, both followed by a single dose of vaginal, oral, or sublingual misoprostol 800 μg 2 days later.

Randomization was conducted to balance the two treatment groups according to maternal age (<30 years versus ≥30 years), body-mass index (<35 kg/m² versus ≥35 kg/m²), previous parity (nulliparous women vs parous women), gestational age (<70 days versus ≥70 days), amount of bleeding (Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart score; ≤2 versus ≥3), and randomizing center.

The primary outcome was failure to spontaneously pass the gestational sac within 7 days after random assignment. .

A total of 357 women were randomized to the mifepristone and misoprostol group and 354 were randomized to the placebo and misoprostol group, with 696 (98%) of 711 women having available data for the primary outcome.

Among the main findings:

  • Fifty-nine (17%) of 348 women in the mifepristone plus misoprostol group did not pass the gestational sac spontaneously within 7 days versus 82 (24%) of 348 women in the placebo plus misoprostol group (risk ratio [RR] 0·73, 95% CI 0·54–0·99; P=0·043).
  • Sixty-two (17%) of 355 women in the mifepristone plus misoprostol group required surgical intervention to complete the miscarriage versus 87 (25%) of 353 women in the placebo plus misoprostol group (RR, 0·71, 95% CI, 0·53–0·95; P=0·021).
  • Fifty (14%) versus 65 (18%) of women in the dual and single-treatment groups, respectively, required further doses of misoprostol (RR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.55-1.09).
  • No significant difference in incidence of adverse events between the study groups.

“Our trial results show the importance of optimizing the medical management of missed miscarriage using the combined mifepristone and misoprostol treatment regimen, which improves outcomes and safety by increasing the proportion of women who have miscarriage resolution and reducing the need for surgical management,” Chu and colleagues wrote.

A study limitation cited by the researchers was the lack of generalizability to women with incomplete miscarriage due to their exclusion from the study.

“The biological rationale for focusing exclusively on missed miscarriage was that the anti-progesterone effect of mifepristone was less likely to be relevant in incomplete miscarriage, in which the expulsion of pregnancy tissue has already begun,” they wrote.

  1. Pretreatment with the anti-progesterone drug mifepristone followed by the prostaglandin misoprostol was more effective than misoprostol alone in the medical management of missed miscarriage, with a reduced need for surgical removal of pregnancy tissue.

  2. Findings from the MifeMiso trial make a strong case for considering mifepristone plus misoprostol as a first-line treatment for early fetal death in which pregnancy tissue is retained in the uterus.

Salynn Boyles, Contributing Writer, BreakingMED™

The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme

Chu and Barnhart disclosed no relevant relationship.

Cat ID: 41

Topic ID: 83,41,728,791,730,41,192,925

Author