A third of people over 65 years experiences at least one fall a year. The Timed Up-and-Go test is commonly used to assess gait and balance and to evaluate an individual’s risk of falling.
We conducted a clinical study with 46 older participants for evaluating the fall risk assessment capabilities of an ultra-sound based Timed Up-and-Go test device. The fall protocols over a period of one year were used to classify participants as fallers and non-fallers. For frailty evaluation, state-of-the-art questionnaires were used. Fall recordings were compared to six Timed Up-and-Go test measurements that were recorded in fallers and non-fallers.
Timed Up-and-Go test data were available for 39 participants (36f, age 84.2 ± 8.2, BMI 26.0 ± 5.1). 23 participants did fall at least once within the fall screening period. We fitted two different regression and probability models into a region of interest of the distance over time curve as derived from the Timed Up-and-Go device. We found that the coefficient of determination for Gaussian bell-shaped curves (p < 0.05, AUC = 0.71) and linear regression lines (p < 0.02, AUC = 0.74) significantly separated fallers from non-fallers. Subtasks of the Timed Up-and-Go test like the sit-up time showed near significance (p < 0.07, AUC = 0.67).
We found that specific features calculated from the Timed Up-and-Go distance over time curve were significantly different between fallers and non-fallers in our study population. Automatic recording and analysis of Timed Up-and-Go measurements could, therefore, reduce time of measurements and improve precision as compared to other methods currently being used in the assessments of fall risk.

Creative Commons Attribution license.
For latest news and updates