For patients with rectal cancer, no biomarker capable of improving monitoring and selection exists for those managed with a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy, notes Franck Pagès, MD, PhD. Following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, he explains, W&W acts as a preservative strategy for patients with rectal cancer with clinical complete response (cCR).
An initial study proposed that the Immunoscore biopsy (ISB), a standardized assay for quantifying immune infiltrate, could be used to help predict clinical outcomes in patients with early- and advanced stage colorectal cancer. To confirm the efficacy of ISB used on pretreatment biopsies to predict time to recurrence (TTR), Dr. Pagès and colleagues conducted an international, retrospective validation cohort study that included 249 W&W patients. The findings were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
ISB Is Independent of and Superior to Clinical Parameters in TTR Prediction
As a predictive tool for patients with rectal cancer, the ISB proves to be a valid biomarker, according to Dr. Pagès. ISB categories are strongly correlated with a gradual scaling of the risk for both distant metastasis and local regrowth (ISB High vs Intermediate vs Low). “ISB is independent and superior to clinical parameters in predicting TTR (Figure),” the study authors wrote.
The authors quantified the density of intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ T cells on pretreatment rectal biopsies via digital pathology and converted the results to ISB. Stratified Cox regression adjusted for confounders was used to assess links between ISB and outcomes. Of 17 additional patients treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery, the immune status of tumor draining lymph nodes (n=161) was investigated by 3’RNA-Seq and immunofluorescence.
ISB Is Significantly Correlated With Disease-Free Survival
The study team observed that recurrence-free rates at 5 years were 91.3% (95% CI, 82.4%- 100.0%), 62.5% (95% CI, 53.2%-73.3%), and 53.1% (95% CI, 42.4%-66.5%) with ISB High, ISB Intermediate, and ISB Low, respectively (HR for ISB Low vs High, 6.51; 95% CI, 1.99-21.28; log-rank P<0.001). ISB was also significantly correlated with disease-free survival (log-rank P<0.001) and predicted both local regrowth and distant metastasis.
In multivariate analysis, ISB was independent of patient age, sex, tumor location, clinical primary tumor (cT) stage, and clinical regional lymph node (cN) stage, and was the strongest predictor for TTR (HR [ISB High vs Low], 6.93; 95% CI, 2.08-23.15; P=0.0017). The addition of ISB to a clinical-based model significantly improved the prediction of recurrence. Furthermore, B-cell proliferation and memory in draining lymph nodes was observed in the draining lymph nodes of patients with cCR.
These findings, the study team noted, bolster previous evidence supporting the use of ISB as a marker in colorectal cancers. The potential value of ISB as a valuable prognostic tool, they add, is exemplified in non-operative management of localized rectal cancer.
Could Preserved Lymph Nodes Be a Risk Factor for Local Recurrence?
“The data from this large international cohort of [patients with] rectal cancer with cCR [that was] managed nonoperatively validate the prognostic value of ISB and could pave the way for prospective therapeutic trials guided by ISB to adjust monitoring and/or therapy of W&W patients,” the study authors wrote. For future research, Dr. Pagès and colleagues would like to explore the hypothesis that preserved lymph nodes in a W&W strategy may be considered a risk factor for local recurrence. “Our findings not only raise this possibility but raise speculation that the lymph nodes may act as a relevant immune site,” they noted.